AMD FreeSync requires new equipment: the GPU. AMD GPUs have a particular segment devoted to FreeSync. This is not at all like the Nvidia G-Sync where the screen deals with it. AMD FreeSync is not a software solution. There is no assurance that the PS4 or Xbox One have the FreeSync equipment on them. A software solution would be NVIDIA’s FastSync. Besides, it is not a simple win.
Which one is better? AMD FreeSync Versus Nvidia G-Sync and FastSync
As a console producer, you’d be stating: Great, the TVs don’t bolster it! As a television maker, you’d be stating: Great, the consoles don’t bolster it! As AMD, you’d be stating: Great, why might Sony and Microsoft acknowledge another common equipment highlight that possibly benefits their opposition and generally just television organizations? We don’t offer more consoles over our opposition with this element!
The main organization that could straightforwardly profit by FreeSync on TVs is Sony. Furthermore, the PS4 Pro ship has as of now cruised. No word on regardless of whether the GPU bolsters FreeSync. That is to say, it presumably does. However, we don’t have the foggiest idea.
Microsoft doesn’t lose anything specifically from not having FreeSync. Since the optional FreeSync stage is ruled by Windows.
There are enormous market obstacles to supporting FreeSync on TVs. Regardless of the possibility that it is reasonable to bolster. Regardless somebody needs to make a special effort to burn through cash on it when market request is dinky, best case scenario. AMD has as of now implied that FreeSync TVs are coming. However, it’s not affirmed yet.
Source: Ars Technica